+880 1521-203767
(Whatsapp,
Imo,
Viber)
BLURB Epistemology or sources of knowledge has always been problematic and contentious. This is not only with reference to the issue of hegemony, when the empowered tends to impose its ‘knowledge’ on the disempowered but also with reference to the political contamination of disciplinary quests and treatment of space, which often tends to distort knowledge itself. If this is the case then there is good reason to hold the view that the treatment of space, whether ‘land’ or ‘water’ or, for that matter, sources of knowledge, cannot remain apolitical. On the contrary, focus on ‘land’ is as political as the focus on ‘water.’ Epistemology otherwise is hardly devoid of politics: ‘whose perception,’ ‘whose reasoning’ or ‘whose testimony’ is as vital as the ‘hegemonic apparatus’ within which perception or testimony is reproduced.
Tk.
200
150
Tk.
670
503
Tk.
500
361
Tk.
2050
1538
Tk.
3100
1705
Tk. 320
Tk.
215
161
Tk.
467
364
Tk.
350
200